NY Times Columnist: Glass-Steagall Wouldn’t Have Prevented the JPMorgan Loss or the Financial Crisis – Hit & Run : Reason.com

Glass-Steagall wouldn’t have prevented the last financial crisis. And it probably wouldn’t have prevented JPMorgan’s $2 billion-plus trading loss. The loss occurred on the commercial side of the bank, not at the investment bank. […]

The first domino to nearly topple over in the financial crisis was Bear Stearns, an investment bank that had nothing to do with commercial banking. Glass-Steagall would have been irrelevant. Then came Lehman Brothers; it too was an investment bank with no commercial banking business and therefore wouldn’t have been covered by Glass-Steagall either. After them, Merrill Lynch was next — and yep, it too was an investment bank that had nothing to do with Glass-Steagall.

Next in line was the American International Group, an insurance company that was also unrelated to Glass-Steagall. While we’re at it, we should probably throw in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which similarly, had nothing to do with Glass-Steagall.

via NY Times Columnist: Glass-Steagall Wouldn’t Have Prevented the JPMorgan Loss or the Financial Crisis – Hit & Run : Reason.com.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.