And why, why, why the continued obsession with a few millions dollars of private, voluntary funds flowing to skeptics when prominent global warming scientists suck down a hundred times as much from taxpayer funds? One would think that a hypothesis about money in the debate could be tested with real data, but for some reason the data in articles about this are about only one side.
via A Response to Popular Ad Hominem, err Science, Magazine on Global Warming Skeptics – Forbes.